Frankenstein. In Frankenstein, The Monster Interacts With

Frankenstein In Frankenstein, the monster interacts with the family in a manner that suggests how he understands aspects such as isolation, loneliness, compassion, and family. An assessment of the monster s character reveals that it has a sensibility to expand and grow its understanding towards a family s social significance. The monster has a sense of solitude and otherness from the way he seeks to interact for a specific reason. The interaction with family has a major influence towards the welfare of the monster because it develops a feeling of compassion. According to the accounts that take place in the narrative, it is evident that the cottage is situated in a location away from the village, as the monster decided to seek refuge in†¦show more content†¦The family is separated from the Frankenstein creature by a single wall, which has a hole the monster uses to monitor the family. Through the monster s ability to slowly monitor the cottagers, he learns more about family and the aspect of love besides other important elements of a family such as a familial hierarchy. The theme of sensibility is notable in Victor s intellectual and philosophical personality. The narrative about Frankenstein provides a suitable lesson about family structure requirements for the development of sensibility. The monster makes a series of discoveries about family structure through several studies of how families work and coordinate. Familial hierarchy is one of the most important lessons learned from the narrative. Which is attained by the monster when he begins to understand how the old blind man in the family cottage is the patriarch of the family. Ideally, the monster lacks a father figure in its life and resolved to consider the old man as a surrogate parent. Another notable aspect of the lesson of a family is subsequent from the way the monster watches the old blind man encourage his children about the matter of life. Education on family structure entails indulgence in inner relat ionships that existed in the confinement of isolatedShow MoreRelatedKnowledge, The Sculptor Of Character : Mary Shelley s Frankenstein1060 Words   |  5 PagesDavid Ibarra Mr. Carroll Brit Lit - Period 7 March 31, 2015 Knowledge, The Sculptor of Character: Frankenstein Socrates once said, To know, is to know that you know nothing. That is the meaning of true knowledge. This quote holds much truth as a truly knowledgeable and wise person would recognize that there is always more to learn and no one will always know everything. Thus, this idea states that new knowledge will constantly enter and shape one’s character. Similarly, the idea of being awareRead MoreThe Negative Impacts Of Human Nature1453 Words   |  6 PagesImpacts of Human Nature in Frankenstein Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is a classic dark novel about the scientist Victor Frankenstein who defies the laws of nature, creating a horrifying aberration. This monster later went on to committing horrific deeds and became a destructive force that destroyed the life of his creator. However he was not innately destructive, but is rather an example of the destruction and pain caused by the tendencies of human nature portrayed in Frankenstein. Curiosity, the impetusRead MorePower ; S Passion For Knowledge In Mary Shelleys Frankenstein848 Words   |  4 Pagesoverpowering. Frankenstein is talking to Walton about his mistakes through his quest to acquires knowledge. He explains that it is better for people to think they are the only people in the word than to try and become greater than their nature will allow. He starts telling Walton his story. He states , â€Å"No one can conceive the variety of feelings which bore me onwards, like a hurricane, in the first enthusiasm of suc cess† (54). Through his use of the simile, â€Å"like a hurricane,† Frankenstein explains theRead MoreThe Power Of Passion In Mary Shellys Frankenstein1253 Words   |  6 Pagesself-destruction that can be brought about by one’s passion. This is the theme in many books. In Mary Shelly’s novel Frankenstein, the devotion that the Frankenstein and his Monster have for their passion exemplifies and, in the end, causes their eternal suffering. In the story, Frankenstein is rescued from freezing to death in the Arctic by a researcher named Walton. Frankenstein tells Walton his life story and how he made the biggest mistake of his life which was pursuing the acquirement of knowledgeRead MoreAllusions Vs. Mary Shelley s Frankenstein 1520 Words   |  7 PagesAllusions to Paradise Lost in Frankenstein In the classic gothic novel Frankenstein, Mary Shelley creates numerous allusions, or references to another work, to John Milton’s epic, Paradise Lost. Allusions can be interpreted differently by each individual, and do not have absolute meanings. They are indirect, which means that the author does not specifically mention the book or epic that he or she is referencing to. Though in Frankenstein, Mary Shelley directly mentions Milton’s Paradise Lost atRead MoreSimilarities Between Frankenstein And The Creature995 Words   |  4 Pages Throughout the novel, Victor Frankenstein and the Creature developed many similarities. Frankenstein and the creature relate in their relationship with nature, desires for family, desire to learn more, and a sense of pain. Throughout the book they became closer to one another although the challenges of the world around them change their relationship with one another dramatically. The differences in between the creator and creature along with similarities show how contrasting can be a positive andRead MorePsychoanalysis of Victor Frankenstein Frankenstein by Mary Shelley1246 Words   |  5 PagesShelley s Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein creates a monster that murders several people, and then flees through Europe to the Arctic Circle. In the beginning of the story, it seems that Frankenstein is simply a scientist chasing a pipe dream of finding the key to eternal life, but closer analysis of the text reveals that Frankenstein is not sane, and possibly suffering from one of many psychology disorders, causing hallucinations and psychosis, it is my contention, that Victor Frankenstein is hisRead MoreAlexandra Giambruno. Mrs.Schroder. English Iv Honors. 231030 Words   |  5 Pages2016 Frankenstein Frankenstein is considered a gothic novel that has different elements that combine to create what the story is. The story of Frankenstein has mysterious aspects that help the main character Victor create the monster. In a gothic novel, there are a ton of abstract thoughts that can be in play pertaining to the type of story that the author creates. Power and Constraint is one point that plays a lot in the novel itself, it all started with the main creator. Victor Frankenstein hadRead MoreFrankenstein, By Mary Shelley955 Words   |  4 PagesIn Mary Shelley’s novel, Frankenstein, dreams, nightmares, goals, and aspirations of the the scientist, Victor Frankenstein, and his creation, give insight to events that will occur later in the novel. The dreams and aspirations of Victor Frankenstein and the creature he creates contrast to the harsh realities that they are faced with. Frankenstein’s first dream foreshadows the death of his beloved wife and several others whom he is close to. His second dream foretells a potentially fatal encounterRead MoreEssay on Perception in Mary Shelly ´s Frankenstein828 Words   |  4 Pagessenses.† In Marry Shelly’s Frankenstein, perception plays a key part in the monsters’ icy demise. Not only is the story affected by how the villagers perceive the monster, but the readers’ perception, like in any literary work, plays the role of ultimate judge. Most responses to Frankenstein are derived directly from pop culture.The green dude with bolts, right? or Oh yeah†¦ I love Frankenberry cereal! Soon, they’ll realize that Frankenstein is not the monster, but actually the name of the

The Golden Age Of Chamber Music - 1300 Words

Franz Joseph Haydn Down the history of music, the classical era was known as the golden age of chamber music. This chamber style of music was largely established by Haydn, Mozart, Beethoven and Schubert. Joseph Haydn was one of the most prolific composers amongst the first Viennese schools (Haydn, Mozart, Beethoven), in the classical era. Joseph Haydn was born in Rohrau, a little Austrian village not far from Hainburg in the year 1732 on March 31st. His parents were of a poor background but loved music and hard work, maybe it is to say Haydn got his working ethics from the teachings of his parents. Haydn had always been exposed to†¦show more content†¦At the cathedral, he was taught to sing and play the violin and the piano. He was also taught other school studies like Religion, Latin, Writing and Arithmetic. Unfortunately, he was dismissed from the choir with reason being that his voice sounded terrible along with the coming years. Nevertheless, He was still hardworking and industrious and sought to seek help from people like Metastasio, (a poet) and Nicholas Porpora, (his singing master) who taught him how to compose music. Haydn was becoming famous and later got to meet Gluck, (the opera composer), Wolfgang Mozart and his father Leopold Mozart. Later on, Haydn attracted the attention of the music loving aristocracy of Vienna. At the age of 29, he was invited to become the music director (or vice-capellmeister as it was called) to the family known as the Esterhazys of a great man, Prince Paul Nicolaus Esterhazy. They were a wealthy Hungarian family known for their patronage of the arts. This was otherwise known as the patronage system which was famous during the classical period whereby kings, popes and the wealthy provided support and privileges to musicians or artists; in return, they create more music or art for their sponsors (patrons). Haydn had in possession an orchestra, an opera company, a

Assess Different Sociological Explanations of SuicideAnomie free essay sample

Using material from Item A and elsewhere, assess different sociological explanations of suicide. (21 marks) Suicide is the  intentional  taking  of  ones  own  life and sociologists over the years have tried to put forward various explanations for why someone may do this. Within sociology there are many different views on suicide on the causes and explanations for it, these come from two main methodologies which are Positivists who believe that sociology is a science and they should aim to make causal laws on suicide rates, compared to Interpretivists who believe that they should look for meaning behind occurrences and certain individuals experiences before the suicide. Other perspectives also put in their views on what they believe to explain suicide for example, Realists. Item A references to Durkheim’s Structural Functionalist view on suicide, as stated Durkheim believes that due to sociology being a science with the topic of suicide it is very easy to make causal laws or as said in Item A ‘social facts’. Due to the fact Durkheim believed that there were a number of causes behind suicide he form four types of suicide from a Positivist viewpoint. Egoistic suicide which is when individuals are not integrated well enough into society for example people who live alone compared to those who live with family. Secondly Altruistic suicide which is when individuals are felt to be too integrated into society causing suicide, for example members of the armed forces were said to have greater suicide rates than civilian personnel as they were too strongly integrated into a united body. Durkheim also put forward the idea of Anomic suicide, this is when the norms and values in society become unclear or confused in times of great social change and an individual is not taught to adapt to changes well enough. For example an unexpected death of a family member is sudden social change which can cause Anomic suicide. Lastly, he suggested Fatalistic suicide. Fatalism is the thinking of the individual that they can do nothing to affect their situation and individuals find their future blocked and oppressed due to society over regulating them. For example slaves and prisoners may have this mindset when they take their own lives. Durkheim said that his work on suicide had several merits as it correctly revealed that suicide is a social rather than psychological occurrence and proved his methodology that you can establish laws and show that sociology is a science. However his theory on suicide has been met with some criticism. Douglas claimed that Durkheim’s work relied too heavily on the use of official statistics on suicide and he incorrectly assumed that these were representative of the real truth. Douglas notes that official statistics are socially produced and can be distorted in many ways, for example via concealment and varying definitions of suicide by coroners meaning that the validity of the statistics is doubted. So Douglas himself put forward an explanation for suicide. Douglas adopted a Symbolic Interactionist perspective, along with a interpretive methodology which is opposite to that of Durkheim. Some would argue that Douglas selected to look at suicide as an area of investigation as he thought it would illustrate the beliefs of Interactionists and highlight the short comings of the Structural Functionalists positivist approach. Douglas used psychiatrists reports and newspaper accounts to come up with his four patterns of social meaning for suicide and within his study he took a very subjective approach looking at meaning and motives. In Douglas’ view suicide could be due to four reasons, the first to gain release from the cares of the world to find happiness, to change the opinion of others in the suicides favour, to achieve a state of fellow feeling creating a climate of sympathy or to simply get revenge towards those who are causing pain towards them. Douglas believed that his work highlighted that suicide is a rational act rather than an automatic response to the environment as people are active not passive, and also to show that sociology is not a science and we should look into meanings over statistics. Obviously this was highly criticised by Structural Functionalists such as Durkheim who believed that Douglas’ work was too unscientific and that he incorrectly assumed that the nature of man is active rather than passive. Another sociologist who takes an Interpretivist methodology is Atkinson, believing that social meaning and context is more important in finding root causes. However unlike Douglas, Atkinson is a Ethnomethodologist which has a central belief of showing that each individual use their own members methods to work out what they see. This is why Atkinson decided to study suicide, also to show how official statistics are not enough. Atkinson focused on a Coroner’s report and underwent participant observation at an office to see what methods they used to decide whether a death was suicide or not. Atkinson stated that they used ‘common sense’ theories of suicide so if certain information were to fit the theories it would be called a suicide. They would look at clues to help decided, Atkinson named a few to which he believed was important within their decisions. Firstly was there a suicide note left, this clearly is a big clue to whether or not the individual meant to kill themselves. Secondly how did the individual die as certain ways such as hanging point towards suicide, also the location of the body, usually if it is hidden away out of sight then the person is indicating that they did not want to be found. Finally did the individual have any past mental illnesses or life history that could lead them towards suicide. Atkinson therefore stated that a suicide verdict reflects the assumptions and interpretation of the clues by the coroner rather than reality and facts. Atkinson’s study was said to have some merits as it did identify what clues coroners use to arrive at a suicide verdict, but also shows that positivists use of quantative data such as official statistics is not valid as they are produced by coroners who base the label of suicide on their own social assumptions. Hindess put forward a criticism for both Douglas and Atkinson, arguing that although Interpretive researchers have maintained that suicide statistics can be misleading they haven’t stated to what extent they distort people’s ideas, so therefore it may only be slight and still be possible to make accurate causal laws from a Positivist viewpoint. Taylor has put forward his view on suicide, taking a Realist approach which is very different from the explanations already stated. Taylor has tried to combine both Interpretivist and Positivist methodologies to come to a verdict on suicide. Taylor underwent a study on the London Underground and people who had died from falling underneath a train asserting that causal factors are important in considering suicide especially that of significant others such as family. In his investigation over half of the 32 who had died were said to have committed suicide although they were no actual evidence, coroners just based this on history of mental illness. Ignoring such factors of suicide and focusing on coroners is unrealistic, so looking at causal factors is from Taylor’s view a valid approach. But it is also important to gain a fuller understanding of suicide by finding a synthesis between the causes of the occurrence which is the Structural Functionalist side but also the exploration of the social meanings behind it, showing the Interactionist approach. Taylor therefore identified a category for suicide which is Sacrifice suicide, where it has occurred by the conduct of other people towards the suicide, for example family members have made the individuals life so unbearable this is the only way out. An advantage of Taylor’s approach to suicide is that it attempts to show how both positivist and interpretive methods are useful in trying to understand suicide, however certain sociologist have criticised it for being too one sided. It has been stated that Taylor focused more on the Interactionist failing to achieve ‘Structuralism’. Another criticism from Durkheim is that Taylor’s cause of suicide that he put forward seems unimportant compared to the large scale of the structural causes central concern such as sudden social change which is a more widespread reason. To conclude many sociologists have differing views to try to explain suicide and why they think individuals do take their own lifes, however these are just theories because no one will ever know the real root cause of why someone has ended their lives unless they leave a note explaining why and in many causes this does not happen.